The Use of Historical Method Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The Use of Historical Method - Term Paper Example slightly historians ar also interested in asking how and so what. Various questions in history are hard to answer because 1) sources do non fully describe what happened, or do not good dealdidly explain why they did something 2) sources sometimes use couched or diplomatic words to express themselves 3) history is a complex combination of numerous factors, such as culture, morality, beliefs, et al., that affect language and ways of communicating and sense each other 4) definitions are not universally agreed upon and 5) subjects change throughout time. victorian historic writing seeks out facts. In reality, however, facts bay window be presented with biases, because historians themselves have different viewpoints on what happened and why/how they happened. Proper historical writing should also differentiate facts from assertions. If historians want to talk roughly interpretations or arguments, they must be clear about this inten tion in their writings. History should not be about what they think happened, barely what truly happened. In the absence of facts, historians offer conjectures and theories about history. Some fields of acquaintance accuse affable science as a phony science, because it is open to researcher bias and methodological weaknesses. Social science research, however, can respond to these weaknesses and reduce writer bias and methodological flaws, thereby improving the validity of their methods, findings, and conclusions. The problems of complaisant science research are researcher bias, bad data set, logical fallacies, relativism and normative definitions, level of consequence and variations, credibility of sources, misleading statistics, misinterpretation of facts, conspiracy theories, and other research problems that concern language. Like other research, their digest and conclusions can also be prone to fallacies in reasoning. Some of the common problems with writing are 1) not know ing who your audience is, and so the language and writing style do not fit their level of knowledge and expectations, 2) use biased language that alienate or discriminate other groups, 3) not using the right punctuation marks, and 4) not proofreading. Proofreading is essential because it catches and corrects typographical, grammatical, spelling, and usage errors. Student should maximize existing writing centers. These centers can help them make their thesis, outline, and first draft. The advantages of primary source are that writers can interpret the primary sources for themselves, sooner of relying on the interpretations of others, and primary sources gather data firsthand, thereby reducing bias from having someone interpret it. subaltern sources are helpful in gathering background or historical information about a topic, and in expanding understanding on events or subjects, by exposing the readers to different perspectives, interpretations, and conclusions. Secondary sources al so already synthesise or combine studies and facts, thereby reducing time needed to read them all. What historians add or not add to history impact their narration of facts. It is interesting how world history books, for instance, include or do not include certain events, people, and conjectures. This may be due to the need of condensing material, but this can also be linked to what the writers and publishers think as important and unimportant. Sometimes, I read history and ask, how about the women? What